Showing posts with label Atheist Analysis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Atheist Analysis. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 16, 2015

Re: Why I Hate the Phrase: “True Christians Don’t Do That!”



Link to the Article

I actually liked this article. The author raises a good point. Every brand of Christian thinks they are right and others are wrong in some way or another. That's fine. That doesn't mean there is no correct way. The authenticity of one's adherence to the teachings of Christ will be determined at the right time. It won't be me, nor will it be this author. The author writes, "There is no way to determine which denomination is following the bible the correct way. There is no one correct way to follow Christ. If there was 40,000+ different denominations wouldn’t exist." That is a presumption. There was one group once upon a time, then there were two and then more. That was because groups started to degrade the original teaching of one church. The Church, made up of fallible and broken individuals can make mistakes and they have at times. That fact does not negate that God exists and that he established a church, outside of which there is no salvation.

Laurence Gonzaga
6.16.15

Re: Cursed are the Meek, for They Dream of Being Enslaved


Link to Article
  1. You can't just take one passage to make your point. Obviously, not all Christians have been, are, and will be, meek. But it would be convenient to make the author's point that Christians are only made up of gullible ignoramuses. 
  2. The idea that a bunch of men with power came together and cooked up the Jesus story and then managing to impose that on an entire group of people to systematically enslave their minds is rather unlikely. I'm not sure how you could even begin to prove such a theory other than simply asserting it as fact.
  3. The author writes, "They believe those obviously made-up fairy tales because when they were very young they were taught not how to think but what to think, and were warned on pain of unimaginable eternal torment never to doubt what they were taught." If it were that obvious then how does one explain how Christians become atheists. IQ doesn't magically change because a person get's butt hurt and now has a philosophical axe to grind against religion. Atheists also become Christians or religionists, so how does the author explain that? Maybe they lose IQ points, as a result of PTSD perhaps. 
  4. This article was nice poetry. Perfect for all atheist conspiracy theorists. 
Laurence Gonzaga
6.16.15

Re: God Isn’t Real but the Devil Is: Childhood’s End and Five Years of Hell



Article

This was a good piece to read. Abuse is nothing to ignore. Anyone who suspects abuse should address it to the proper people and/or authorities. Of course, use your best judgement. The only thing I can criticize about an article such as this is that it is used as a way of arguing against the existence of God. What happened to this young girl and now woman was terrible and the one responsible needs to answer for his crimes. However this:
I now know that God did not “let” this happen to me because God does not exist. No God would allow something like that to happen to a child.
... is a leap in logic. Tragedies do not disprove the existence of God. It may disprove certain ideas of God, but could not in itself disprove his existence.

Laurence Gonzaga
6.16.15

Monday, January 5, 2015

Re: Religious Indoctrination Is Child Abuse [VIDEO]





Link to Post at Atheist Analysis

There's really not much to respond to here. It's basically an anti-religion quote from someone famous and a short video with no arguments or explanation. This is why I have no problem linking to both the post and the video here. If it had any persuasive power I might have been tempted to not reference it. I would be interested in a presentation on what psychological abuse is and clinically accepted examples of it, then examples of how religious indoctrination qualifies for psychological abuse, and some peer reviewed journal studies on religious indoctrination and negative effects that are correlated with it. I can't imagine ever having a true experiment that proves this link, if any, since you would have to say you are randomly assigning a subset of the population to the experimental group with "psychological abuse" treatment. That would be unethical methinks. Try again atheists.

Update: 1/21/15

They uploaded a new version. I had to watch the first version above to see what the difference is. It's basically the same video with less sinister music. The power of AV media, huh? My criticism above still stands. A video without any real substance.

The Newsboys are now Atheists


That title probably got your attention didn't it? Well probably only if you're Protestant and love Christian contemporary pop music. I tried to tune in on time to the program on the atheist analysis channel on YouTube where yesterday's program was interviewing a former band member of the Newsboys. I didn't really know the background of this band. I probably listened to a song or two in my time doing youth ministry. However, I never really got into Protestant contemporary Christian music because the theology was always found wanting. Nevertheless, I was interested to see what this program had to offer. I still need to listen to the whole thing to give it a fair assessment. But I did do a little research on the history of the Newsboys and found that the person being interviewed hasn't been a member of the band for 25 years. He left in 1990 a few years before the band even made  any waves in the US music scene. And so I'm just wondering without examining any of the content, what's all the hype about referring to this interviewee as a member of the Newsboys. Sure he helped found it but it's kind of a misleading ploy to get people to watch the program when he wasn't even a contributor to the popularity that the band has enjoyed since his departure.

Bottom line is, Christians lose their faith all day long, everyday. Sometimes they are pastors or priests, and sometimes they are musicians. On the other hand many ordinary folks, community leaders, and even musicians become believers all day long, every day. Neither case proves anything other than we make small and big choices every day. 

Saturday, January 3, 2015

A Response to Atheist Analysis’ Christopher Tanner - Part II



“The parents locked Leelah away!. They took every form of communication away from her except CHURCH! They took her even out of school (which was confirmed by WPCO News). They gave her back her stuff after months of isolation then they restricted where she could go. She said over the last year she had seen her friends 3 times! You tell me how the hell that is right?”

Are you saying non-religious parents wouldn’t do this? I don’t believe I’ve seen any Biblical or church directive that has ever prescribed this. Maybe their brand of Christianity or their pastor advised this; I really don’t know (and neither do you). I think a commentary on the choices these parents made can be assessed on their own. Any causal relationship their behavior has with their religion from what we can draw from what we know of the case would only be speculative. My opinion is that imposed isolation is not helpful for anyone that has symptoms of depression.

“And we are not talking about Leelah being a bad person and getting caught stealing or harming others, BUT BECAUSE SHE IS TRANSGENDER!”

So it would be justified punishment for those things?

“Come on Laurence how the can you sit there and type this with a serious face? It is not because Leelah killed herself just because she was depressed. She was isolated, taken to counselors that do not care to deal with transgender issues (probably because they they do not believe in it) and give a high dose of anti depressants which in teens has been known to cause suicide.”

Christopher, individuals commit suicide for all sorts of reasons. Everyone has varied thresholds of what their personalities can bare to take. It would only be opinion to suggest that it is because of the imposed isolation and inadequate counseling that led to the suicide. I was not aware the child was prescribed antidepressants. By whom was this prescribed? Primary physician or psychiatrist? As in any case even in adults psych meds can precede suicide, but you can’t really say they cause suicide.

“So if an atheist or apitheist house hold respected a child for any reason to that extreme of a basis, sent them to counselors that only practiced pseudo-science, and then allowed their child to take high dose of medication that has been shown to increase the risk for suicide then I would be just as angry. And if this same house hold did this because of something they did not understand that did not harm the family, I would be fucking irate.”

I didn’t ask if you would be mad. I asked what would you blame? If parents make bad choices then let’s talk about the choices. It is illogical to just blame their choices on their religion as the irreligious can and do make the same choices. You added “counselors that only practiced pseudo-science”. I was talking about atheists going to atheist therapists. Suicides happen for various reasons, Christopher. If a client commits suicide, you can’t just blame the methods of the professional. If the professional violates the code of thics for their license then that’s a different story.

“So I am not being unjust in my analysis of their parenting. I am taking the known information and making a judgment based on it which is what all normal people do. I even gave them the benefit of the doubt and said that their religion had poisoned their thinking. You eluded to that they were bad parents and their religion had nothing to do with it.”

If the religion influenced their choices then we would have to get that from their admission. Otherwise we are speculating on it. Maybe they learned it from their family culture? Who knows?

“Now I have reasons to believe and there has been books written by others that suggest we would be better off without religion. You do not get to make the claim that I am using mystic power to see what would happen without religion and then turn around and say if we diid not have religion that we would be narcissistic personalities rising up. You are guilty accusing me of what you did your self in the next sentence.”

Good point. So, let me retract my precognitions. That still leaves you with my objection. We can only imagine a world without religion. However, we do have atheistic societies that have nevertheless replaced religion for nationalism or some other personality cult. They have new documentaries on happiness ideologies by self-help gurus.

“Now the problem is that this blog nor my second one was not the time or the place to discuss life without religion. I can write a future blog if you want but these blogs were not about the total overview that life would be better without religion.”

OK. I look forward to it.

“Last I bestow anger and vitriol when ignorance is displayed. Her parents with either bad parents or ignorant because of their religion.”

Not sure who you will win over if vitriol is your approach. The parents may or may not have been ignorant because of their religion. I can’t say as I don’t know what their religion taught.

“But my latest batch of vitriol comes because while I will continue to have the conversation about religion and will keep my vitriol in check for that, THE LIVES of Transgender individuals and the ignorance displayed in society for the UNEQUAL treatment of those individuals I will not keep my tongue. I will speak out, and pointedly because those that do not care nor understand the issue at some point are not worth discussing and I will fight to change the laws so people can not suppress Transgender Individuals.”


More power to you. I can appreciate when people are passionate about causes they believe in. I was just curious if you feel your style wins people over to your cause. Otherwise you are preaching to your choir. 

A Response to Atheist Analysis’ Christopher Tanner



Christopher Tanner writes (to “Speck Of The Cosmos”):

I appreciate the comments. I have been a trans and lgbtq Ally for probably 8 years now openly speaking out. I understand you want the article to be written by a trans person and I have nothing against that either. I also know many trans individuals in the movement and am personal friends with them well.

But that doesn’t mean I should be quiet. It doesn’t mean I should wait and let someone else write something. As allies we have to speak up. We have to voice that we are disgusted with this treatment. We have to tell people that they need to also stand up. Without the support of everyone a minority group will get bullied. Would it be more powerful coming from a transgender individual yes I think it would. But that doesn’t mean I should keep quiet.

As for not harassing the parents I am split. I think they are horrible people but I think their religion is worse. That is why I posed it as either their religion has made them bad people or they are bad people. But ultimately if we didn’t have religion we would not have this as big of an issue. I still think it could be but not to the extent it is because of religion. I am sorry but I think religion has done so few good things for society that I would rather not have it at all.

But I am not reducing the trans struggle to just religion because people are bigoted no matter what. But I can point out that the struggle would be easier without religion especially if we accepted science for what it was and instead of going to church on Sunday they spent 3 hours reading about science. Knowledge is power.

Lastly if you don’t feel the need to give the girl a proper burial that is fine. You don’t have to. I feel that it would send a message to society no matter what that even if someone doesn’t accept their child as trans that society will and society will start to instill this in people since the parents have failed to do so.

Laurence responds:

“As for not harassing the parents I am split. I think they are horrible people but I think their religion is worse. That is why I posed it as either their religion has made them bad people or they are bad people.”

They are bad people? I’m sorry, do you know what actually happened or did you just go blog surfing? On what basis or standard do you call them “bad”? If you are a father, and I think I heard on one of your programs you are, aren’t you lucky the public doesn’t know your misdeeds and bad choices as a parent. If I find a story of a teenager who commits suicide in an atheist, agnostic, or this latest BS I’ve been reading about “apatheist” household, who will you blame? The facts are what they are for this case, and they don’t need your spin on the matter to suit your agenda. If you want to raise awareness for your cause, so be it. But you’re sounding as “judgmental” as religionists are portrayed as. If you were once one of those kinds of Christians, you may have left the religion, but you kept the same vitriol.

“But ultimately if we didn’t have religion we would not have this as big of an issue. I still think it could be but not to the extent it is because of religion. I am sorry but I think religion has done so few good things for society that I would rather not have it at all.”

Oh I see, you have the mystical power to peer into parallel universes that don’t have religion. Religion may not be here in a hundred or a thousand years, but it is here now. Get over it, dude. If there was no religion, narcissistic personalities would still rise up and call the people so some ideological action. I never had a problem with the “question authority” kind of slogan. I think that’s good, but you can actually do that without being an asshole as well. Believe it or not, I like what you and Atheist Analysis is doing. Some things are thought provoking, but then there are some moments of vitriol like my encounter with those Prophetcast idiots, and the messenger(s) lose their credibility, and ultimately hurts the message.

Friday, December 19, 2014

Re: Prophetcast: Episode 60 (On Pedophilia and the Catholic Church)


Above you will find an amazing apology from one of the "hosts" of Prophetcast, an atheist show on Atheist Analysis. "A little" heated is a bit of an understatement. In the last 10-15 minutes or so, he was speechless, befuddled, and could barely string a sentence together, until he basically cut the program short because he about had it. What could possibly get him to react this way? A simple correction and attention to detail. I was expecting these guys would be interested in truth and science and the like. But apparently that all goes by the wayside when they are called out on their erroneous understanding of terms that they use. Everyone makes mistakes, but they continued to resist and reject correction and gave up. How can anyone accept such a spectacle? The arrogance astounds me. 

Link to Broadcast on Youtube


Streamed live on Dec 14, 2014Prophetcast strives to bring an open forum to discuss religion, atheism, secular humanism and the politics and current events surrounding them. Having regular guests join the show and constant new ones, Prophetcast is always open to new ideas for topics and invites anyone as future guests!
What happened was these guys were responding to news that a Protestant pastor stated that he thinks gays should be stoned to death and are all pedophiles. Instead of refuting such an obviously false statement, they instead used it as an opportunity to attack the Catholic Church by saying that when they think of pedophiles they think of Catholic priests. That's when I commented on the Atheist Analysis chat that they should read the 2004 John Jay College of Criminal Justice (CUNY) study on the abuse crisis in the Catholic Church (read it here) from 1950-2002.

  1. The greatest percentage of cases were cases of post-pubescent boys being abused. 
  2. Pedophilia is perpetration towards pre-pubescent children, not post-pubescent children. (Source: Forensic Psychology, p. 127) As such, they could not refer to the crisis as simply a "pedophilia scandal". When corrected, the hosts clearly could not understand, either by admission or perhaps intellectual capacity, that there is a difference. 
  3. Pedophilia is an issue of power and dominance and so does not have a preference between boys or girls. 
  4. Victimization for pedophiles has more to do with availability and access to victims, in which case was mostly boys (altar boys, all boy schools). 
  5. So what do we call it when victimization involves post-pubescent boys (majority of cases). I made the simple parallel. What would you call an adult male who victimizes a post-pubescent and yet under the age of consent female? You can say it is "predatory heterosexual behavior". Who could argue with that description? 
  6. Replace the female with a post-pubescent male and what behavior is that? You can say it is "predatory homosexual behavior", which is exactly what I called it in the chat. 
Now these hosts, instead of calmly assimilating the data, decided to mock it, oppose it, and engage in the most amount of logical fallacies in the shortest amount of time that I've heard in a while. C'mon guys...

I think for this reason alone that these guys have no business doing a show like this. As I suspected, their show description is a sham, and the only real "bigots" are these two idiots. Did I show hate at all for any group? Not at all. If anyone, these two did against believers and Catholics.

big·ot

 noun \ˈbi-gət\
: a person who strongly and unfairly dislikes other people, ideas, etc. : a bigoted person; especially : a person who hates or refuses to accept the members of a particular group (such as a racial or religious group)

Source: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/bigot

Re: Heretical Minds SE01 EP06: Trauma



Description

Streamed live on Dec 18, 2014

This week Joseph and Chris will dive into the physical and mental once again. Trauma and its many variations, the danger of its short and long term implication, signs to look for, and much much more will be covered. Brain chemistry changes, personality shifts, amazing survival stories, and of course some dry nerd humor because Chris simply cannot resist the temptation sometimes...

This is the newest series to be premiering on the Atheist Analysis Network and will be concentrating on psychological phenomena and their many biological implications, new or cutting edge scientific developments, and the political consequences of new scientific, psychological, and engineering discoveries. Joseph brings years of expertise as a practicing psychology major and former devotee of the church of Jesus Christ and the Latter Day Saints while Chris is a Mechanical Engineering entrepreneur and life long non believer.

Response




  1. Find a real expert, either having academic credentials or functional expertise in the field.
  2. Know your audience and purpose.
  3. Be clear in the presentation.

Sunday, December 14, 2014

Re: Atheist Analysis S03 E21: The Science behind Marijuana, Weed Recipes, and Greydon Square

Link
  1. God: aliquid, quo nihil majus cogitari posit (that than which nothing greater can be conceived). I'm not a proponent of the ontological argument btw. It's a simple definition, however. 
  2. An atheist acting morally, even morally congruous to Christian principles doesn't mean God does not exist. Atheists can have moral values, I think the real issue is what obligation does one have to act morally? On what basis can those with power in society dictate what those without power can and cannot do? On what basis can you even evaluate that? I'm not sure if social contract is good enough, in the absence of pre-existing Judeo-Christian moral principles. 
  3. Tattoos? Foundation by which we will teach.... Sounds like a religion is forming... to hearken back to the John Moesman interview. 
So, the show seems to be a sham. LOL. They invite Q and A, but havent addressed any of my comments. 

Saturday, December 13, 2014

Re: Godless Offering Ep 10 Were Ex Christians Ever Really True Christians



Link

This was an excellent presentation from an old friend since my Xanga apologetics days, Jeremiah Bannister. It is a great apologetic for why a monotheist Christian should NOT be a Protestant. I have to say, however, it is not a case against being a Catholic. In this presentation Jeremiah lumps Catholicism in the mix here and there, but I think it may do a disservice to the viewer as he very well knows that the very reason why he became a Catholic in the first place is that Protestantism does not have that mechanism by which one can determine or know for sure what is sound doctrine or at the very least, what must be believed or done for salvation.

The short answer from Catholic theology is: A person can become a Christian and leave Christianity. The person is free and Catholicism does not teach eternal security or the perseverance of the Saints. If Jeremiah believes he was a Christian then he was as far as anyone can tell. If he left, he was no less a Christian.

It would require a further step on the Catholic level to argue that that mechanism that Catholicism posits as the answer to that doctrinal division and to get that certitude for what is to be believed or done, the papacy, and then say that that answer becomes meaningless since there are also divisions within the Catholic fold as well, not to mention popes teaching strange doctrines as well albeit non-infallibly, but still gives the orthodox Catholic cause for pause. Sorry for the run on, but that's how I want it to be read.

You would have to watch the full program where I actually intervene with one of my questions. Unfortunately, the best part of his answer was given off air in a private chat on Google Hangouts.

Some reactions:
  1. 49:33 - This is an excellent question. The problem of evil haunts us again. I will say that it is easier giving the philosophical response when we don't have a detailed scenario in mind. This scenario is a particularly potent one. I would first say, God's ways are not our ways and we can't possibly understand his reasons or his methods at times. I realize that is not satisfactory to the inquiring mind, but it is what we have with what Christians believe. Second, the problem of evil does not disprove God, it could only disprove that he is either all-powerful, all-knowing, or all-good, or all three. 
  2. 52:48 - This was my question. Since this broadcast I remembered in more detail that last phone call I had with Jeremiah. He was actually already back from sedevacantism. However, if I recall his family was having a difficult time making it to the local Eastern Catholic church. In any case the question I was really getting to was he and his family have been on quite an ideological and theological journey through very many camps. I'm just wondering if this will be home for the Bannisters. I appreciate that he has the intellectual honesty to admit that he could not dogmatically say that he could not be persuaded otherwise ever. 
My overall reaction is this: I think it is wonderful to question. I think that's the beauty of trying to find the answer to this question. We may never feel absolutely secure in this life (even if it may be all we have) that we have reached the answer. I just hope that everyone who holds such cherished beliefs, does so passionately and sincerely and is willing to discuss the reasons for his or her faith, God, gods, goddesses, or the absence thereof. 

Laurence Gonzaga
12.13.14